Thaler Law Firm PLLC
  • Home
  • About the Firm
  • Firm News
  • Professionals
    • Andrew M. Thaler
  • Practice Areas
    • Bankruptcy >
      • Considering Bankruptcy
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Creditors' Rights
    • Mediation
    • Trustee Representation
  • Testimonials
  • Contact
    • Potential Debtor
    • Potential Creditor
  • Blog

Does Bankruptcy Discharge Business Owner’s Liability for Employee Wages?

2/6/2019

0 Comments

 
Author: Andrew M. Thaler
I am often asked if bankruptcy can discharge an employer’s obligation to pay wages to an employee. The answer is – it depends. The bankruptcy code sets forth a list of certain debts that an individual cannot discharge. Drafters of the Bankruptcy Code decided that it would be against public policy to discharge certain debts (i) owed to financially vulnerable persons; (ii) owed to governmental entities; or (ii) that arise out of a debtor’s bad behavior. If a debt falls into one of those categories, there is a high likelihood that the debt may not be discharged in a chapter 7 bankruptcy.
The Bankruptcy Code specifically excepts from discharge, debts procured by fraud, fraud or defalcation while acting as a fiduciary, embezzlement, domestic support obligations, willful and malicious injury, death or personal injury caused by unlawful operation of a vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating substances, most student loans and many taxes, to name a few.

There is no specific exception to discharge for not paying wages to an employee. So, the short answer is that claims for wages can be discharged if it is deemed to be nothing more than a breach of contract. However, if there are findings that the employer acted with either personal malevolence or with conscious disregard to the employer’s duty to pay employee wages, the debt could be deemed non-dischargeable under the “willful and malicious” category of debts that will not be discharged.

Exceptions to discharge are strictly and narrowly interpreted so as to promote the Bankruptcy Code’s purpose of providing a fresh start to debtors. A plaintiff seeking to object to discharge of a debt bears the burden of establishing the requisite elements by a preponderance of the evidence. The bankruptcy statute contemplates willful and malicious injury analogous to an intentional tort in these matters.

Although a debtor may have breached an employment contract with the worker by failing to pay wages that were due, a breach of contract unaccompanied by tortious conduct does not give rise to a non-dischargeability claim. The mere failure to pay an obligation cannot be a willful and malicious injury in and of itself. There must be other facts to support willful and malicious conduct. One court has held that the debtor committed a tort willfully because, inter alia, he knew he owed wages to his employee, that his failure to pay those wages would, with substantial certainly harm his employee, and he had the means to pay wages but refused to do so. If funds have been earmarked for wages or debtor lies about his ability to pay wages, while at the same time diverting assets for debtor’s personal use to avoid paying those wages, the willful and malicious standard has probably been met. The cases are very fact sensitive.

Even without personal malevolence a person will be found to have acted maliciously when that person acts in conscious disregard of his or her duties or without just cause or excuse. Malice require conduct more culpable than that which is in reckless disregard of the creditor’s economic interest and expectancies. A debtor acts with malice by intending or fully expecting to harm the economic interest of the creditor. A debtor’s knowledge that he is violating the creditor’s legal rights is insufficient to establish malice absent additional aggravating circumstances. Thus, it must be established that the debtor intended the consequences of his act to cause harm to the creditor, not simply the act itself.

In short, there are three elements the creditor must prove. One, the debtor acted willfully. Two, the debtor acted maliciously. Three, the willful and malicious actions caused injury to the creditor or its property.

Consultation with an experienced bankruptcy attorney is advised if faced with this situation.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Authors

    This blog is maintained by:
    Andrew M. Thaler

    View my profile on LinkedIn
    Spiros Avramidis
    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Categories

    All
    Bankruptcy Cases
    Bankruptcy Filings
    Bankruptcy General
    Bankruptcy/Matrimonial
    Bankruptcy/Personal Injury
    Bankruptcy/Real Estate

    Archives

    November 2021
    June 2021
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    September 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014

    RSS Feed


Thaler Law Firm PLLC
675 Old Country Road
Westbury, New York 11590
Phone: (516) 279-6700 | Fax: (516) 279-6722

Disclaimer
Thaler Law Firm provides the information and materials on its website and blog for informational purposes only. The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice.
Further, the use of this information, and the sending or receipt of such information and materials, does not create an attorney-client relationship between us. Prior results do not guarantee a future or similar outcome.

The application and impact of laws can vary widely based on the specific facts involved. Accordingly, the information is provided with the understanding that the authors are not herein engaged in rendering legal, accounting, tax,
or other professional advice and services. As such, it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting, tax, legal or other advisers.

Materials and information in this presentation is proprietary in nature belonging to Thaler Law Firm and may only be reproduced in its entirety (without modification) for the individual reader’s personal or educational use and must include
this notice of our proprietary interest and the prohibition of reproduction

TLF is considered a debt relief agency.
TLF helps people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code.
Attorney Advertising | Copyright © 2015 Thaler Law Firm PLLC | All rights reserved
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.