Thaler Law Firm PLLC
  • Home
  • About the Firm
  • Firm News
  • Professionals
    • Andrew M. Thaler
  • Practice Areas
    • Bankruptcy >
      • Considering Bankruptcy
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Creditors' Rights
    • Mediation
    • Trustee Representation
  • Testimonials
  • Contact
    • Potential Debtor
    • Potential Creditor
  • Blog

Supreme Court Holds That Funds in Inherited IRAs Are Not Exempt

6/12/2014

0 Comments

 
​On June 12, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Clark v. Rameker, a case involving a relatively straightforward issue of statutory interpretation, one of significant interest to individual debtors, consumer bankruptcy attorneys, and trustees. Writing the unanimous opinion for the Court, Justice Sotomayor framed the issue as “whether funds contained in an inherited individual retirement account (IRA) qualify as ‘retirement funds’ within the meaning of” section 522(b)(3)(C) of the Bankruptcy Code. Answering in the negative, the Court affirmed the Seventh Circuit and held that “[t]he text and purpose of the Bankruptcy Code make clear that funds held in inherited IRAs are not ‘retirement funds’ within the meaning of §522(b)(3)(C)’s bankruptcy exemption.”

Ruth Heffron established a traditional IRA in 2000, naming her daughter, Heidi Heffron-Clark, as the sole beneficiary of the account. After Heffron died in 2001, her IRA account, then containing approximately $450,000.00, passed to Clark as an inherited IRA. In October 2010, Clark and her husband filed a chapter 7 bankruptcy petition, listing the inherited IRA, at that time worth approximately $300,000.00, as exempt under section 522(b)(3)(C) of the Bankruptcy Code. Rameker, the chapter 7 trustee, and several unsecured creditors objected to the claimed exemption, arguing that funds contained in an inherited IRA do not constitute “retirement funds” within the meaning of the statute.

The Bankruptcy Court agreed with Rameker and disallowed Clark’s claimed exemption, relying on the plain language of section 522(b)(3)(C), finding that an inherited IRA does not contain anyone’s 
“retirement funds.” The District Court reversed, finding that section 522(b)(3)(C) covers any account containing funds that were originally accumulated for retirement purposes. On appeal, the Seventh Circuit reversed the District Court, emphasizing the different rules governing inherited IRAs as compared to traditional IRAs. The Seventh Circuit found that “inherited IRAs represent an opportunity for current consumption, not a fund of retirement savings.”

Justice Sotomayor began her opinion by examining the language used in section 522(b)(3)(C). She determined that the term “retirement funds,” as used in section 522(b)(3)(C), is “properly understood to mean sums of money set aside for the day an individual stops working.” Turning to the legal characteristics of traditional and inherited IRAs, the Court identified three primary differences justifying its holding. 

“First, the holder of an inherited IRA may never invent additional money in the account.” To the Court, this aspect of inherited IRAs made those accounts vastly different than traditional IRAs, “[f]or where inherited IRAs categorically prohibit contributions, the entire purpose of traditional and Roth IRAs is to provide tax incentives for accountholders to contribute regularly and over time to their retirement savings."

“Second, holders of inherited IRAs are required to withdraw money from such accounts, no matter how many years they may be from retirement.” The Court noted the Tax Code requires inherited IRA beneficiaries to either draw down the entire account within five years after the owner’s death or take minimum annual distributions each year. In contrast to traditional IRAs, where the Tax Code promotes saving these funds for a later date, the Tax Code requires the beneficiary to withdraw the funds in an inherited IRA, regardless of the beneficiary’s age or working status.

“Finally, the holder of an inherited IRA may withdraw the entire balance of the account at any time—and for any purpose—without penalty.” The Court emphasized how starkly different this is from traditional IRAs, where owners pay 10% tax penalties for withdrawals made prior to age 59½. Based on these three primary differences, the Court had little trouble concluding that inherited IRAs do not contain funds that qualify as “retirement funds” for the purposes of section 522(b)(3)(C). 

In sum, the Court’s decision is one that bankruptcy trustees and creditors will surely welcome, though at the expense of individual debtors. Debtors and consumer bankruptcy attorneys will now need to look closely at the exemptions available under their state laws to determine whether they can exempt the funds in inherited IRAs under some other legal theory, since they can no longer do so under the Bankruptcy Code.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Authors

    This blog is maintained by:
    Andrew M. Thaler

    View my profile on LinkedIn
    Spiros Avramidis
    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Categories

    All
    Bankruptcy Cases
    Bankruptcy Filings
    Bankruptcy General
    Bankruptcy/Matrimonial
    Bankruptcy/Personal Injury
    Bankruptcy/Real Estate

    Archives

    November 2021
    June 2021
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    September 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014

    RSS Feed


Thaler Law Firm PLLC
675 Old Country Road
Westbury, New York 11590
Phone: (516) 279-6700 | Fax: (516) 279-6722

Disclaimer
Thaler Law Firm provides the information and materials on its website and blog for informational purposes only. The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice.
Further, the use of this information, and the sending or receipt of such information and materials, does not create an attorney-client relationship between us. Prior results do not guarantee a future or similar outcome.

The application and impact of laws can vary widely based on the specific facts involved. Accordingly, the information is provided with the understanding that the authors are not herein engaged in rendering legal, accounting, tax,
or other professional advice and services. As such, it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting, tax, legal or other advisers.

Materials and information in this presentation is proprietary in nature belonging to Thaler Law Firm and may only be reproduced in its entirety (without modification) for the individual reader’s personal or educational use and must include
this notice of our proprietary interest and the prohibition of reproduction

TLF is considered a debt relief agency.
TLF helps people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code.
Attorney Advertising | Copyright © 2015 Thaler Law Firm PLLC | All rights reserved
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.